Search and find what you need faster.

Lawrence Stephens appoints Memery Crystal Real Estate team

Posted on: January 31st, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Farringdon based full-service law firm Lawrence Stephens is pleased to announce the appointment of Directors John Aynsley, Chris Cagney, Matthew Hind, Nickhil Mandora and Sam Silverman to their Commercial Real Estate department, who all join from the highly regarded Real Estate group at Memery Crystal.

John Aynsley was previously Head of Real Estate at Memery Crystal, specialising in the acquisition, disposal, development, regeneration, financing, and management of high-value assets in commercial real estate. He acts for clients ranging from international real estate funds and listed house builders to private investors.

He is joined by fellow Directors:

  • Chris Cagney, who has extensive experience in a range of commercial real estate matters as well as advising on development projects and property finance transactions.
  • Matthew Hind, who specialises in general commercial real estate with a mixture of investment, development, finance, occupier, and management work. He also has considerable experience dealing with distressed real estate on behalf of banks and insolvency practitioners.
  • Nickhil Mandora, who acts for a wide variety of clients ranging from retail landlords and tenants to institutional lenders and property developers. 
  • Sam Silverman, who has acted for major international and domestic clients including developers, funds, corporate occupiers and supermarkets within the office, industrial and retail sectors.

Commenting on his appointment, Director John Aynsley stated: “We are very pleased to join Lawrence Stephens at this important moment for the firm. Their extraordinary growth over recent years is evidence of their ambition and can-do attitude, which we share and clients clearly love. We look forward to building on what are already strong foundations and working closely alongside the rest of the Lawrence Stephens team.”

Managing Director Steven Bernstein commented: “We are delighted to welcome John and his team to Lawrence Stephens. Their arrival coincides with a period of exciting growth for the firm and will provide both bench strength to our existing team as well as extending the range of expertise and experience we can now offer to both existing clients and new prospects.”

Danny Schwarz and Sophie Levitt discuss how the rise in NICs will affect property investors and landlords, in FT Adviser

Posted on: January 13th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Head of Commercial Real Estate Danny Schwarz and Solicitor Sophie Levitt discuss how the increased rate of employer Class 1 national insurance contribution rates will impact property investors and landlords.

Danny and Sophie’s article was published in FT Adviser, 13 January 2025.

NIC Rate Hike: UK businesses brace for landlord and tenant turmoil

Rachel Reeves presented her Autumn Budget 2024 to Parliament on 30 October, to a mixed reception. One of the most controversial changes announced was that the government will be increasing the rate of employer Class 1 National Insurance Contribution (NIC) rates from 13.8% to 15%. The current rate of 13.8% is payable on the amount that an employee’s earnings exceed the secondary threshold of £9,000 per year/£175 per week. However, the increased rate will be 15% and the secondary threshold will be reduced to £96 pounds per week/£5,000 per year. These changes to employers NIC rates will come into effect on 5 April 2025, however are already posing concerns for the UK’s retail and hospitality sector.

While the increase in employer NICs aims to raise revenue for vital services, such as the NHS, and may increase funding for contributory benefits, such as the State Pension, the measure could have a profound effect on retail and hospitality businesses due to the increasing costs such businesses face and may result in shop closures, and others feeling the strain.

As a result of these changes, it is vital that property investors and landlords consider how these measures will impact their buying strategies, and tenants may well consider renegotiating their lease agreements to offset the higher operational costs which may otherwise impact their businesses.

For landlords and tenants alike, these reforms pose a number of challenges.

Operational costs

The prospect of raising employer National Insurance costs could prove to be a major setback for businesses. As a result of these reforms, businesses could be forced to face higher operational costs due to increased NICs, which would reduce their profit margins and place a greater strain on their livelihoods. For instance, it has been estimated that Tesco alone could face a £1 billion pound increase in its National Insurance bill over the course of this parliament.

Smaller and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are expected to be the most severely impacted as a result of these changes. SMEs often operate on tighter profit margins and many such businesses will therefore be forced to decide whether to fund the higher NICs by operating on reduced profits, cutting back on expenses or increasing their prices.

As a result, a phased introduction of the NIC threshold may be a better way for businesses to absorb the costs without passing them on to consumers in the form of higher prices.

Price increases

If a retail business opted to increase their prices of goods and services to offset the higher costs, consumer spending and demand could also be impacted as a result of the NIC hikes. Higher prices could exacerbate the cost-of-living crisis, making everyday items more expensive for shoppers.

It therefore comes as no surprise that more than 70 of Britain’s largest retailers have signed an open letter to warn the Chancellor that the NIC hike may lead to price increases and job losses throughout the high street. Some of the signatories included Aldi, Lidl, Boots, Ocado, Morrisons, Greggs and JD Sports – all of whom share concerns about the viability of such proposals.

Lease agreements

Business tenants who face the higher operational costs from the increased NIC rates may also seek to renegotiate their lease terms as a result of these changes. This could potentially lead to more flexible or reduced rent agreements since landlords are likely to be reluctant to lose longstanding tenants and will want to avoid being left with vacant properties and no rental income.

There are several ways for landlords to offer incentives and concessions to tenants to help them through this new financial burden. Temporary rent reductions could help tenants manage their cash flow during challenging times. Landlords could otherwise offer reduced rent for early renewal, waive certain fees or provide additional services such as maintenance.

Consequently, the terms of the lease could be made more manageable for tenants.

Rent arrears

Moreover, under the strain of these measures, certain landlords may also be less willing to renegotiate their lease terms and tenants may struggle to absorb the additional costs. Tenants, particularly in the retail and hospitality sectors, may be unable to generate enough income to meet their rent obligations. This could lead to higher rates of tenant defaults, leaving landlords with no choice but to forfeit their leases and to re-market the property. If landlords were left with no rental income, this would place a further strain on their finances.

There would also be additional expenses including administrative costs and legal fees when dealing with tenant defaults.

The fact that the British Retail Consortium is seeking a meeting with the Chancellor to discuss their concerns about the increased NIC rates, is proof that the scale of the new costs has the potential to cause severe financial hardship across different businesses.

Property transactions

The hike in NIC rates could affect the overall cost structure of property transactions and lead to higher property prices for buyers and sellers. Buyers may face higher purchase prices, which can affect affordability and demand in the property market. This could create a more challenging environment for property transactions, with reduced demand leading to slower market activity. 

If property investors and developers must operate on reduced profit margins, therefore, certain projects may seem less attractive or viable. This could lead to a decrease in the number of new development projects.

Higher NIC rates would also likely lead to increased labour costs for property investors and developers. This would inevitably make construction and development projects more expensive, potentially leading to higher prices for new properties.

Additionally, higher costs may be reflected by the fees of the professionals who are involved in the development projects, such as surveyors, architects and contractors.

Reduced investment

With increased costs due to higher NIC rates, landlords and tenants may also reduce investments in property improvements, expansions, or new technology, potentially slowing growth and innovation in the sector. The NIC rate hike has the potential to exacerbate economic uncertainty and make buyers, sellers and investors more cautious.

It is highly likely, therefore, that the changes will affect the overall health of the property market and have a significant knock on effect on the UK’s retail and hospitality sector.

Potential for legal disputes

Unsurprisingly, therefore, changes implemented as a result of the Budget could lead to legal disputes over lease agreements, employment terms and other obligations as parties adjust to the new financial landscape. There is also potential for businesses to struggle to comply with these new NIC regulations, which could lead to disputes with HMRC over unpaid contributions or penalties for non-compliance.

It is vital that businesses stay updated with the latest NIC regulations to ensure that they remain complaint. Payroll systems will need to be reviewed and updated to reflect the changes in the NIC rates. Compliance will reduce the risk of disputes arising from regulatory issues and will ensure a smoother operation of business.

Navigating the increased secondary NIC liability

As a result of Reeves’ proposals, the UK government estimates that 940,000 employers will face an increased secondary NIC liability. It is therefore inevitable that businesses across the UK and especially SMEs are feeling the pressure of this financial burden. It is essential for businesses to consider a variety of cost saving measures and to save price increases and redundancies as a last resort.

Landlords must also take a balanced approach and agree to renegotiate their lease agreements with loyal tenants if it is reasonable to do so. Landlords may be able to offer more flexible payment plans or allow temporary reductions with the agreement to recoup the difference at a future date.

However, maintaining open and transparent communication is fundamental.

Landlords and tenants should discuss the financial challengers together to find mutually beneficial solutions. By adopting this strategy, landlords can help their tenants through financial hardship whilst maintaining occupancy and fostering positive landlord-tenant relationships.

Looking ahead

Unsurprisingly, the proposed NIC hikes has provided cause for concern for many UK businesses in the retail and hospitality industry. From the impact on operational costs to the risk of litigation, there are a plethora of factors that must be considered if businesses are to weather the storm and remain both profitable and compliant.

In order to navigate these choppy waters, it is therefore vital that businesses seek tailored legal advice concerning their employment obligations and property agreements to ensure that they are braced for the upcoming changes and able to tackle the issues head on.

For more information on our Commercial Real Estate services, please click here. For our services in the Retail and Hospitality sector, click here

 

Lawrence Stephens advises The Cotswold Company on the expansion of its omni-channel presence

Posted on: December 19th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

Lawrence Stephens has advised The Cotswold Company, the well-known premium furniture and homeware brand, on commercial contracts to support the expansion of its omni-channel presence through third party retailers. The company has launched its products on NEXT.co.uk and with John Lewis & Partners online, alongside the introduction of a dedicated brand space within the iconic Peter Jones store in Chelsea.

Founded in 1996, The Cotswold Company offers a range of thoughtfully designed furniture, with a focus on quality materials and craftsmanship. These contracts mark the brand’s first entry onto third-party retail platforms, complementing its fast-growing e-commerce site and 10 UK showrooms.

In a recent article in Retail Week, Cotswold Company chief executive Ralph Tucker said: “With our new partnerships with John Lewis Partnership and Next – both of which have gone live in time for Christmas – we’re making tangible steps towards delivering growth and becoming one of the UK’s leading premium homeware brands.”

Rachael Pinchbeck, Head of Commercial Finance, The Costwold Company said “Bradley and Craig were a pleasure to work with. Their contractual expertise and retail experience resulted in the smooth and timely completion of contracts ahead of our successful launches. We look forward to working with Bradley and the Lawrence Stephens team on future projects.”

Director Bradley Lee advised on the commercial contracts, while real estate advice was provided by Director Craig Mullen.

Lawrence Stephens prepares source of funds reports for property bought at auction using crypto assets

Posted on: December 16th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

Despite cyptocurrencies becoming more mainstream, recent commentary suggests that investors are still finding it hard to utilise these to purchase property in the UK. A recent Financial Times article highlighted the low appetite for sellers to accept cryptocurrencies. As a result, if purchasers want to use their crypto investments towards a property purchase, this usually involves converting the cryptocurrency into traditional or fiat currency – legal tender established by government regulation.

Much of the reluctance to accept funds derived from  the disposal of cryptocurrency comes from its well-publicised association with criminal activity, in particular money laundering. Law firms have obligations imposed by the SRA in relation to checking sources of wealth and sources of funds for anti-money laundering (AML) purposes. Solicitors have a legal duty to ensure that any, and all, funds used within a property transaction have come from a legitimate source. They must therefore establish the original source of the funds, not the mere availability of funds in a bank account.

Establishing the legitimacy of funds generated through cryptoasset activity requires the instruction of an expert who is able to carry out a full report on the crypto proceeds being used. The content of this report includes documenting and reporting of the cryptoasset activity, including the initial ‘on-ramp’ into crypto (i.e. the exchange of traditional fiat money into cryptoassets), the purchase of cryptoassets, and the subsequent cryptoasset activity to the ultimate liquidation and ‘off-ramp’ from cryptoassets back into traditional fiat money which was then being used to make the purchase. This report can then form the basis on which the conveyancer can make a judgment as to whether it is safe to proceed with the proposed transaction.

There are currently few law firms with the required expertise to produce such reports. Buyers wishing to use crypto assets for property purchases should be especially aware of the need to establish legal source of funds when buying property at auction.

The Lawrence Stephens’ team was recently called in at short notice to assist a client who had purchased a property for £210,000 at auction. He had intended to fund the purchase by utilising proceeds mainly generated through investing and trading on cryptoassets. Our client had instructed solicitors in relation to the purchase. However, just two days before the notice to complete was due to expire, the client was informed that they did not have the necessary expertise and could not provide the required report on the source of funds coming by way of crypto. At this late stage, he was at risk of losing his 10% deposit.

The Lawrence Stephens’ team – comprised of Asim Arshad and Gunduz Misiri – were able to take on the instructions and were able to extend the notice to complete by three days. This gave the team enough time to complete a full crypto source of funds report to verify the funds coming by way of crypto and intended to be utilised for the purchase. We were pleased to effect the completion of the purchase within the agreed upon extended time.

 

Danny Schwarz and Stephen Dodge discuss the redevelopment of Oxford Street in Property Week

Posted on: October 2nd, 2024 by Hugh Dineen-Lees

Head of Commercial Real Estate Danny Schwarz and Trainee Solicitor Stephen Dodge explore the proposed pedestrianisation of Oxford Street, and discuss its potential impact on London’s retail and hospitality sectors, in Property Week.

Danny and Stephen’s article was published in Property Week, 2 October 2024, and can be found here.

Facelift will revive Oxford Street

Some shops may lose out, but pedestrianisation plan will broaden iconic retail destination’s tenant mix.

Last month, London mayor Sadiq Khan announced radical plans to pedestrianise London’s iconic Oxford Street. This proposal, Khan’s second for the famous high street, appears likely to succeed thanks to a Labour-led Westminster council, and for Oxford Street the timing could not be better; it is ripe for revitalisation.

The pandemic resulted in a slew of notable Oxford Street shop closures. With tourism statistics showing footfall is still yet to fully recover, it is clear that the retail district is struggling. This is hardly surprising; Oxford Street is often not London’s most desirable destination. Its pavements are cramped, the thoroughfare is plagued by antisocial drivers and the shopfronts are infested with much-derided American candy shops.

So, how will pedestrianisation breathe new life into Oxford Street? Case studies on the pedestrianisation of locations such as nearby Carnaby Street or Copenhagen’s Strøget Street are telling. Despite objections from business owners, particularly restaurateurs, these streets were closed to traffic and experienced significant increases in footfall. Local businesses benefited from an increase in customers.

However, there are risks involved in this latest proposal for Oxford Street. Prior to the announcement of plans for pedestrianisation, the post-pandemic rebound was in full swing on the street. Property vacancies are down 40% from 2023, with leasing activity breaking records in that year and remaining high now. With rents rising for commercial tenants on and around Oxford Street, mere speculation on the pedestrianisation proposal is likely to see rents continue to spike. The value of freehold titles could similarly creep upwards.

Tenants subject to upcoming rent review may see rates rise far beyond their short-run means and there is a risk that landlords may see an opportunity to trade up tenants, exercising break clauses to hike rents. Property lawyers will be busy with a flurry of breaks, renewals and disputes.

However, tenants on fixed rents may be buoyed by increased footfall and have a highly profitable few years. Tenants with high-volume businesses also stand to win regardless of their rents, as greater footfall will correlate directly to sales.

Winners and losers
Unfortunately, not everyone will be a winner as a result of Khan’s proposal. Low-volume luxury shops are often more reliant on patronage from customers who arrive by car and may prefer to move elsewhere, as their clients will not wish to brave crowds. At the other end of the spectrum, accessibility will be hampered by pedestrianisation, further inconveniencing those reliant on cabs or buses.

If these long-standing and successful luxury businesses fail, landlords will be seriously affected. Those who relied on the status quo, and did not obtain adequate guarantees or security at their last lease renewal, may also find themselves as low-ranking creditors in protracted insolvencies.

What is clear is that disruption creates opportunity and Oxford Street has already begun to change – no longer are all leases on the high street exclusively for retail use. Parts of John Lewis and similar buildings are being converted to office space, bringing a new type of consumer to the area, while parts of Debenhams are being converted for leisure use, alongside the openings of new entertainment venues. Spaces left behind in the ongoing – and welcome – retreat of American candy shops are similarly ripe for conversion into cafés, which could apply for pavement seating.

A new type of tenant, with a new clientele and different priorities, is coming to Oxford Street. Landlords may find it difficult to adjust to this new normal, but those who can be flexible and see the potential in their new tenants stand to gain from the new face of London’s iconic retail district.

If you would like further information regarding your obligations as tenants/landlords of retail spaces, please contact a member of our Commercial Real Estate team.

Danny Schwarz and Sophie Levitt discuss the proposed outdoor smoking ban in The Times

Posted on: September 26th, 2024 by Hugh Dineen-Lees

Director and Head of Commercial Real Estate, Danny Schwarz, and Solicitor Sophie Levitt discuss the potential impact of the proposed outdoor smoking ban on the hospitality sector, as well as the legal implications for landlords and tenants, in The Times.

Danny and Sophie’s article was published in The Times, 26 September 2024.

Ministers are considering imposing stricter rules on outdoor smoking to reduce the number of preventable deaths connected to tobacco use. There are no final plans, but smoking could be banned in pub gardens, outdoor restaurants and sports grounds.

The proposed ban appears as a puritanical tendency to reach for authoritarian solutions to complex public health problems. When politicians choose to cement their intolerance of the behaviour of others through legislation, it restricts individual freedom, further eroding people’s right to choose what they can do and where they can do it.

Arguably, such misuse of state control is antidemocratic: an extreme anti-smoking agenda which is not supported by scientific evidence that smoking in the open air creates any quantifiable threat to public health.

And now the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) is pleading with the government to abandon plans for greater smoking restrictions in pubs since it would affect their viability as businesses. But not all pubs would be impacted equally by such a ban. For instance, gastropubs are less worried about a slowdown following the ban, given the focus of their business on serving full meals, typically indoors.

While there is some disagreement within the hospitality industry regarding the precise impact of such a ban, there is a broad consensus that beefed up rules need to be clearly worded and ‘outdoor area’ must be precisely defined to minimise uncertainty.

A pub garden smoking ban could affect both landlords and tenants. If the ban has a heavy impact on the viability of tenants’ businesses, they may be unable to generate enough income to pay their rent. Landlords may have to forfeit leases, leaving them with vacant possession and the need to remarket the property.

Tenants would be obliged to comply with the smoking ban, which could be outlined expressly in leases or implied under a compliance with laws clause. If the tenant used the property in a manner which was not permitted, the landlord could forfeit the lease and end the unlawful use. Alternatively, the landlord could claim damages if they suffered any loss because of the tenant’s breach.

While the government’s proposals have received support from public health experts, many landlords, operators and customers have voiced concern that the rules would be unenforceable.

Bar staff would have to police this ban in addition to their existing obligations. Smokers would crowd on pavements outside of pubs, which would cause disturbance and nuisance to neighbours, or breach licence conditions, particularly in residential areas. Smoking could also be prohibited in parks and therefore create confusion in public spaces as it would be difficult to police.

If you are needing advice on matters relating to the hospitality sector or the legal obligations of landlords and tenants in commercial real estate, please contact a member of our Commercial Real Estate team.

Abtin Yeganeh comments on the Renters’ Rights Bill in Property Week

Posted on: September 18th, 2024 by Hugh Dineen-Lees

Head of Real Estate Disputes, Abtin Yeganeh, comments on the Renters’ Rights Bill and how the proposed legislation must carefully balance the rights of tenants and security for landlords.

Abtin’s comments were published in Property Week, 11 September 2024, and can be found here.

“While the proposed Renters’ Rights Bill will be welcomed by the majority of UK tenants, providing them stronger legal protections and implementing a ban on ‘no-fault evictions’, the proposed reforms must strike a balance between the rights of tenants and security for landlords.

“No-fault evictions create a degree of uncertainty for many, with landlords able to evict their tenants without cause at the end of the fixed term of the tenancy. The new bill proposes to abolish this practice, and provide tenants with greater peace of mind.

“No-fault evictions have previously provided landlords with security, as they know they can obtain possession at the end of the tenancy without cause, and the banning of no-fault evictions may therefore provide them with cause for concern. However, importantly, the bill will reform the grounds of possession, with new grounds being introduced to address repeated serious arrears, and situations where possession is required to allow the landlord to sell a property or for the landlord and/or family members to occupy the property.”

If you would like further information on the implications of the Renters’ Rights Bill or have any questions regarding landlord/tenant matters, please contact Abtin Yeganeh

Lawrence Stephens’ Real Estate Finance Borrower team drives summer success with a trio of transactions

Posted on: August 13th, 2024 by Hugh Dineen-Lees

The Borrower team at Lawrence Stephens, led by Nisha Saigal and supported by Claire Boyd and Aida Gashi, has been making significant strides this summer in the real estate market. They’ve taken on a diverse portfolio of residential and commercial properties, collaborating with various lenders.

Here’s a closer look at some of their July deals:

Deal 1: Refinancing of Residential Flats

The Lawrence Stephens team facilitated the refinancing of two residential flats, with a substantial loan amount of £2.45 million. Acting as the sole representative for the borrower, they collaborated with the Bank for Intermediaries/Professionals as the lender. Their expertise in navigating complex transactions played a crucial role in achieving success.

Deal 2: Refinancing of HMOs (Houses in Multiple Occupation)

The team successfully refinanced three Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) with a loan amount of £1.45 million. Acting as the sole representative for the borrower, they collaborated with Hampshire Trust Bank plc as the lender. Their expertise in managing complex transactions ensured a smooth process for all parties involved.

Deal 3: Purchase of Freehold Property

The Borrower team also facilitated the acquisition of a freehold property, subject to tenancy, with a loan amount of £138,000. The transaction involved dual representation, and the lender was a specialist in Buy-to-Let financing. Their ability to navigate complex scenarios and find practical solutions was instrumental in achieving a successful outcome.

These transactions underscore their dedication to cultivating robust, enduring connections with borrowers. The team’s proactive mindset, industry acumen, and streamlined execution position them as a reliable ally in the real estate finance arena.

Residential Real Estate market update: navigating the current UK housing market

Posted on: August 9th, 2024 by Yvonne Uzoka

The Bank of England (the ‘BoE’) Monetary Policy Committee’s recent decision to cut interest rates to 5% and the anticipated government taxation regime announcement in October 2024 are likely to affect both the wider UK housing and Prime Central London (‘PCL’) markets. In this market update our Residential Real Estate team take a look at the possible effects.

Impact on Swap Rates and the UK housing market

Let’s dive in. The UK housing market continues to show robust price growth. Earlier analysts’ predictions of an expected 1.8% rise in housing prices in July 2024, prices have been surpassed by actual increases of 2.1%. This unexpected growth reflects strong pent-up demand as borrowing conditions improve. In anticipation of the BoE’s interest rate cuts, several mortgage lenders, such as HSBC, NatWest and Nationwide, have recently reduced their mortgage rates boosting approvals to around 60,000 per month.

Following the BoE’s decision, five-year swap rates fell to 3.6%, the lowest since February 2024. This is under the crucial 4% threshold and experts are predicting rates will stabilise around 3.25% above pre-pandemic levels.

Why does this matter? The current trends suggest that lenders expect long-term interest rate reductions, making 5 to 10 year fixed mortgages the most cost-effective options. This indicates that lenders are keen to secure borrowers at these lower rates, which are predicted to drop over the next few years – a positive signal for the housing market.

Overall, there is cautious optimism. While house prices are rising steadily, borrowing conditions are improving and no dramatic drops in rates are expected.

The contrasting trends in PCL: signs of recovery?

In the wake of 20+ months of economic fluctuations and high interest rates, the UK property market has shown a mix of different trends. In the broader market Q2 of 2024 saw a 22% increase over the previous quarter for properties valued between £3-15 million. However, during the same time period, PCL prices were falling, with valuations dipping slightly. The trend of increasing average discounts has continued for the seventh consecutive month after three years of declines. This suggests that PCL may be influenced by other factors and the recent interest rate reductions may have a limited effect.

Despite the ratio of available stock to monthly sales at 25:3 in Q1,2024 to 22:6 in Q2, 2024, supply remains high, with an above long-term average of 20. Consequently, sellers must maintain realistic expectations regarding property prices, especially as the market broadens and buyers are presented with more options.

Key takeaway:

  • Demand is rising, but price drops in PCL are likely to continue as supply remains high.

The Government’s taxation updates and potential impacts

Lastly, we address the central government’s upcoming taxation regime, due to be announced in October, and its potential impact on the housing market. The Labour Government’s mandate is pro-growth, with an expectation of coming into effect by 6 April 2025. However, the practical implementation remains uncertain.

They aim to boost public service investment and stimulate the economy without raising income tax, national insurance, or corporation tax, which constitute about 80% of tax revenue. Proposed changes include:

  • Taxation of non-UK domiciled individuals – individuals with 10 consecutive years of non-residence will be exempt on their foreign income and gains received in the first 4 years of residence in the UK. It is irrelevant whether the income and gains are remitted to the UK;
  • Introduction of VAT on private school fees;
  • Abolition of furnished holiday lets (FHL) regime;
  • Adjustments to taxation on carried interest; and
  • Changes to transfer of assets abroad.

It is unclear if the government can achieve growth with these mechanisms or if they will backtrack on promises. As such, borrowers, lenders, and property owners should stay vigilant in the coming months.

At Lawrence Stephens we are dedicated to helping our clients navigate these changes. If you have any questions or need assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our specialised Residential Real Estate team.

Abtin Yeganeh comments on landlord-imposed work from home bans in The Independent

Posted on: July 8th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

Senior Associate, Abtin Yeganeh, comments on landlords banning their tenants from working from home, as well as tenants’ protections in this area, in The Independent.

Abtin’s comments were published in The Independent, 07 July 2024.

“As a general rule, a landlord cannot stop a tenant from working from home as it would interfere with a tenant’s statutory right to quiet enjoyment of their property. The position is somewhat more complicated where a tenant seeks to run a business from their rental property. With that said, whilst landlords can seek to exclude a tenant’s right to work from home, The Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 (subject to several exclusions) provides that landlords cannot unreasonably refuse a tenant’s request to do so.”  

Landlord and tenant works – Construction Industry Scheme payments now made simpler

Posted on: June 13th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

In brief:

Regulations were introduced in April of this year which removed the uncertainty and complexity on which payments made by commercial landlords to tenants are covered by the Construction Industry Scheme (CIS). As a result,  the majority of such payments will now fall outside the scope of the CIS and the requirement for deductions as advance payments towards a sub-contractor’s tax and National insurance to HMRC.

The pre-April 2024 rules created a cumbersome legal and administrative obligation and the removal of these compliance burdens must be welcomed.

Legislation

The Income Tax (Construction Industry Scheme) (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/308)  introduced in April 2024 added a new Regulation 20A to the main CIS regulations which specify that payments made by a landlord to a tenant for construction operations in connection with a lease or agreement for lease are not contract payments and are, therefore, outside the scope of the CIS.

To fall within the scope of this exclusion, payments must meet the following conditions:

  • The payment is made by or on behalf of a landlord;
  • The payment is received by a tenant or prospective tenant (tenants include sub-tenants);
  • The payment is for construction operations agreed in connection with a lease or agreement for lease;
  • The tenant that occupies or will occupy the property will carry out the construction works themselves or contract with a third party to undertake the work; and
  • The payment must be for construction operations relating to works intended primarily for the benefit and use of the tenant that occupies or will occupy the property under the lease.

The definition of ‘landlord’ includes a person with the legal or beneficial ownership of the property, who granted the lease or who will grant the lease.

What does this mean?

Under the pre-April 2024 rules, and prior to entering into any agreement relevant to the construction operations, both the landlord and tenant were required to take legal and taxation advice in order to jointly agree and document that any payments from the landlord to the tenant regarding such construction works either fell within the exclusion for ‘reverse premiums’ in Regulation 20 of the main CIS regulations so that they fell outside the scope of the CIS – or they did not and deductions would need to be made. 

Although contributions made by a landlord towards the tenant’s own fit out works were easier to assess, it was far more difficult where a contribution was being made towards the tenant undertaking Category A fit out works. This led to some landlords being more ‘careful’ in requiring the operation of the CIS on such contributions. Tenants were being asked to take on the added cost of CIS deductions –  as well as the added administrative and cash flow burdens of having to reclaim the amounts deducted. 

The new exclusion under Regulation 20A should lead to most payments by landlords to tenants (or prospective tenants) for construction operations being defined as outside of the scope of the CIS. However,, the implications of Regulation 20A do need to be fully understood.  Most notably,is the requirement that the landlord’s payments must be for construction works intended primarily for the benefit and use of the tenant. This means that any payment which relates to works outside the property occupied by the tenant is likely to fall outside the new exclusion and will therefore remain within the scope of the CIS.

As a reminder…

The new regulations do not affect the application of the CIS to payments by tenants to landlords for construction operations. Take an example where where the landlord has agreed to undertake the tenant’s own fit out works., While these payments will continue to usually fall outside the scope of the CIS, if the tenant will be sub-letting part or the whole of the property or they are registered with HMRC as a so-called ‘contractor’, the CIS deductions would apply in accordance with  Regulation 24 of the main CIS regulations for payments in respect of property used for the purposes of the business of the tenant or another company in the same group.

If you need any advice on the Construction Industry Scheme or any other aspects of construction law, please contact our team of experts Anne Wright and Tom Pemberton.

 

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024: What homeowners need to know

Posted on: June 5th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 marks a significant shift in the landscape of home ownership in England and Wales. This legislation is designed to empower homeowners, providing them with increased rights, greater transparency, and enhanced protections. As a law firm committed to supporting our clients in navigating complex property issues, we are here to break down the key aspects of this transformative Act. 

Empowering homeowners with greater rights and protections

One of the most notable changes is the simplification of the process for leaseholders to buy their freehold. Historically, this process has been both complex and costly. The new legislation makes it easier for leaseholders to secure ownership of their homes and reduces the expenses involved. Additionally, the standard lease extension terms have been extended to 990 years for both houses and flats, up from the previous 50 years for houses and 90 years for flats. This change ensures that leaseholders can enjoy long-term security without the ongoing stress and financial burden of future extensions.

Facilitating the Right to Manage and collective enfranchisement

Leaseholders will now find it much easier to take over the management of their buildings, with the floor space limit for Right to Manage and collective enfranchisement being increased from 25% to 50% of commercial space. This will allow more leaseholders to exercise control over their properties, by appointing their preferred managing agent or collectively buying the freehold.

Streamlined processes for lease extensions and freehold purchases

New leaseholders were previously required to own their property for two years before they could extend their lease or buy the freehold. The Act abolishes this requirement, giving new homeowners immediate rights to extend leases or purchase freeholds, thereby simplifying and expediting these processes.

Enhanced transparency and fairness in service charges

Transparency over service charges has long been a contentious issue between leaseholders and freeholders. The Act mandates that freeholders and managing agents issue bills in a standardised format, allowing leaseholders to scrutinise and challenge these charges more effectively. This move towards greater transparency is a significant step in addressing unclear and often unjustified service charges.

Increased rights to challenge unreasonable practices

The Act empowers leaseholders to challenge their landlords’ unreasonable charges at the Tribunal without the deterrent of covering their freeholders’ legal costs. This change is expected to encourage more leaseholders to stand up against unfair practices, fostering a more balanced relationship between leaseholders and freeholders.

Rights for freehold homeowners on private and mixed tenure estates

For freehold homeowners on private and mixed tenure estates, the Act extends similar rights of redress that leaseholders enjoy. This includes greater transparency over estate charges and the ability to challenge their reasonableness. The legislation ensures that homeowners are well-informed about the charges they incur and can dispute unfair costs.

Banning new leasehold houses and excessive insurance commissions

In a bid to curtail the practice of selling new houses as leaseholds, the Act bans this practice except in exceptional circumstances. This move guarantees that future homeowners will generally acquire freehold properties, ensuring full ownership rights from the outset. Moreover, the Act addresses the issue of excessive buildings insurance commissions by banning opaque and excessive fees, replacing them with fair handling fees.

Conclusion

The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act is a landmark piece of legislation that significantly enhances the rights and protections for homeowners in England and Wales. By making it easier and cheaper to extend leases, buy freeholds, and challenge unreasonable charges, the Act aims to create a fairer and more transparent property market. 

However, while the Act has received Royal Assent, numerous pieces of secondary legislation will be needed in order to clarify the exact, day-to-day application of these changes in practice. It is currently unclear when this additional legislation will be passed.

At Lawrence Stephens we are dedicated to helping our clients navigate these changes and leverage their new rights effectively. If you have any questions or need assistance regarding the implications of this Act, please do not hesitate to contact our specialised Residential and Leasehold Enfranchisement team.